On 26 September, Al-Ahad TV (AAH — official) carried Information Center for Analysis head Salam Adel’s assertion that the government was “innocent” and the Iraqi Company for Airport Services was responsible for the Iranian-flight restriction; he also said the government would never agree to a blockade of Iran. Political researcher Ramadan al-Badran said Iraq could refuse the restriction but would face sanctions. Political researcher Hadi Jilu Marei said Iraq’s weapons would never be directed against Iran, while political analyst Imad al-Musafir called participation in a blockade of Iran religiously forbidden and described the regional war as America’s war against Shiites. These were attributed guest positions, not government decisions or AAH statements.
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Sept, 01:36
“Hadi Jilu Marei: “Iraq’s weapons will never be directed against Iran.””
هادي جلو مرعي: سلاح العراق لن يوجه ضد ايران اطلاقا
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Sept, 01:55
“Salam Adel: “The government is ‘innocent’ … the Iraqi Company for Airport Services is responsible for the Iranian-flight ban.””
سلام عادل: الحكومة "بريئة".. الشركة العراقية لخدمات المطارات مسؤولة عن حظر الطيران الايراني
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Sept, 01:59
“Salam Adel: “The government represents the people of Hussein and will never agree to a blockade of Iran.””
سلام عادل: الحكومة تمثل شعب الحسين "ع" ولن توافق على حصار إيران إطلاقاً
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Sept, 02:11
“Imad al-Musafir: “The war in the region is America’s war against the Shiites.””
عماد المسافر: الحرب في المنطقة هي حرب اميركا ضد الشيعة
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Sept, 02:15
“Imad al-Musafir: “Participating in the blockade of Iran is religiously forbidden.””
عماد المسافر: المشاركة في حصار إيران "حرام شرعا"
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Sept, 02:19
“Ramadan al-Badran: “Iraq can reject the decision to ban Iranian flights, but it will face sanctions.””
رمضان البدران: العراق يستطيع رفض قرار حظر الطيران الإيراني لكنه سيتعرض لعقوبات
Al-Ahad TV carried both a defence of the government’s role and an argument that rejecting the restriction carries a cost; neither guest’s assertion establishes the government’s position or a sanctions decision.