On 3 September, political analyst Ibrahim al-Dahsh, speaking on Al-Ahad TV (AAH — official), said the PMF must submit to law and the state and that parliament should not treat Faleh al-Fayyad’s nonattendance at a hearing as a personal decision. He said continued noncompliance permits questioning, asserted that parliament can replace the judiciary in determining criminal responsibility, and said changing the PMF chairman requires a simple parliamentary decision.
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official03 Sept, 23:28
“The PMF is an official institution that must be subject to law and the state… Fayyadh’s continued failure to respond allows parliament to question him… Parliament can replace the judiciary in determining criminal responsibility… Changing its chairman is linked to a simple parliamentary decision.”
الحشد الشعبي مؤسسة رسمية يجب أن تخضع للقانون والدولة... استمرار عدم استجابة الفياض يتيح للبرلمان استجوابه... البرلمان يمكنه أن يحل محل القضاء في تحديد المسؤولية الجنائية... تغيير رئيسها مرتبط بقرار برلماني بسيط
Compared with general criticism of Fayyadh, this formulation names the institutional steps that could remove him, but the pressure has not yet become a declared parliamentary initiative.