WIRE
KURDISTAN24Iraqi Army chief Visits Sinjar as Iraq Seeks Unified Security Structure2HAMWAJHow Iraqi Kurdish autonomy has been pulled into Baghdad’s disarmament debate7HSHAFAQShafaq News..Former Peshmerga official reveals new Coalition withdrawal details9HBASNEWSIraq Sets June 2027 Deadline to Bring Armed Factions Under State Control10HAL-MONITORRubio meets Iraq’s PM as remaining US troops prepare exit11HSHAFAQShafaq News..Iraq faces security risks as US withdrawal nears12HBASNEWSPMF Says Faction Weapons Not Handed to Government, Rejects Attacks on Erbil12HTHE NEW REGIONIraqi parliament votes on recommendations to resolve fuel crisis12HKURDISTAN24Iraq to Suspend Iranian Airlines From Tuesday amid US Sanctions13HINAParliament approves Public authority to protect regional rights » Iraqi News Agency14HTHE NEW REGIONIraq’s unfinished government: Zaidi’s safest option14HBASNEWSIraqi PM Heads to New York for UN Assembly, Trump Meeting14HINAArmy Chief of Staff and British Counterpart Discuss End of Coalition Mission on September 30 » Iraqi News Agency14HBASNEWSIraqi PM Hails Peshmerga Unification as Boost to National Security15HINANational Approach Calls for Legal Action Against Organizations Promoting Gender Concepts » Iraqi News Agency15HSHAFAQShafaq News..Iraqi parliament urges review of fuel price hike16H
Iraq Monitorعين على العراقPrimary-source intelligence
07 Aug, 08:46 BAGHDAD

Amiri reported urging factions to delay response to Saudi strikes

WHAT HAPPENED

Three press reports published within roughly one hour on the morning of 7 August 2026 describe the same emerging question: whether Iraqi factions will respond to American-Saudi strikes. Rudaw Arabia attributed to Hadi al-Amiri a call on the "resistance" to postpone any response; Fito reported the Iraqi Army warning factions against targeting Saudi Arabia and affirming that the decision for war is exclusive to the state; RojNews reported a "dawn intervention" delaying the factions' response, without identifying who intervened. The rung is held to preponderance because three separate outlets carry mutually consistent accounts, but no militia source in the retrieved evidence confirms, denies or claims anything, no faction is named as the intended responder, and the identity of the dawn intervention is unstated.

WHO CARRIED IT · EVERY MESSAGE, LINKED
  1. فيتو07 Aug, 07:44

    The Iraqi Army warns factions against targeting Saudi Arabia and affirms the exclusivity of the decision for war

    الجيش العراقي يحذر الفصائل من استهداف السعودية ويؤكد حصرية "قرار الحرب"

  2. Rudaw Arabia07 Aug, 08:42

    Al-Amiri calls on the "resistance" to postpone any response to the American-Saudi strikes

    العامري يدعو "المقاومة" لتأجيل أي رد على الضربات الأميركية السعودية

  3. RojNews.News07 Aug, 08:46

    Iraq: a dawn intervention delays the factions' response to Saudi Arabia

    العراق.. تدخل فجريّ يؤجل رد "الفصائل" على السعودية

In posting order. Translated by the desk, published as evidence — not endorsement. A channel name opens the message where it was posted.
WATCH — WHAT WOULD MOVE THIS FILE

a claim of responsibility for action against Saudi Arabia under any Islamic Resistance in Iraq or front brand; a Badr Organization channel (Al-Ghadeer TV, Watan TV or Baa Platform) confirming or disputing the words attributed to Hadi al-Amiri; an explicit faction rejection of the Iraqi Army's assertion that the decision for war is exclusive to the state; or outside confirmation naming which factions were addressed — any of these moves this file.