WIRE
RUDAWIraq’s Basra maintains 2.9 million bpd amid Hormuz disruptions, OPEC+ cuts44MRUDAWIraq, Kuwait seize 700k Captagon pills in joint operation2HTHE NEW REGIONErbil blasts caused by military training, pose no danger: Kurdish counterterrorism2H964 MEDIAErbil airport still cannot sell travellers dollars, 14 months after suspension3H964 MEDIAHakim tells US envoy the weapons file runs on Iraqi timelines4HKURDISTAN24Iraq Says Oil Exports Reach 2.6 million bpd Despite Strait of Hormuz Challenges5HKURDISTAN24Central Bank Says Iraq Has Sufficient Dollar Reserves as Dinar Weakens6HSHAFAQShafaq News..Some Iraqi cards lose overseas payment access: Source6HKURDISTAN24KRG Council of Ministers Tasks Ministries for Federal Loans7H964 MEDIATalk of removing zeros from the dinar is driving people to buy dollars, economist says7HREUTERSIraqi court opens trial of six French Islamic State suspects7HKURDISTAN24Iraq's Sovereignty Remains Constrained, ICP Chief Says7HSHAFAQShafaq News..Source: Iraq postpones case of six French ISIS suspects7HKURDISTAN24Baghdad Security Operation Leads to Arrest of Abu Deraa's Son8HSHAFAQShafaq News..Two Al-Qurban members jailed in Iraq suicide case9HSHAFAQShafaq News..Dollar slips in Baghdad, Erbil markets9H
Iraq Monitorعين على العراقPrimary-source intelligence
05 Aug, 21:57 BAGHDAD

On Al-Ahad TV (AAH — official), Sadiqoun General Council member Ahmed Adnan said the statement responding to Saudi Arabia "does not represent all of the Coordination Framework of Resistance" and that weapons control is an Iraqi decision to which everyone must submit

WHAT HAPPENED

In a #Nisf_Daira block aired on Al-Ahad TV (AAH — official owned media) shortly before 19:00 on 5 August 2026, Ahmed Adnan of the Sadiqoun Movement's General Council said the statement issued in response to Saudi Arabia did not represent the whole Coordination Framework of Resistance, that weapons control is an Iraqi decision unconnected to any external position, that everyone must submit to it, and that any response must come from within state institutions including the PMF. Two further guests in the same block took different lines on the same incident: political researcher Mukhalad Hazim said the targeting was an American rather than a Saudi desire and that it was wise not to respond, while Reconstruction and Development Coalition figure Khalid Walid said his side is proceeding with the government on state monopoly of weapons and that a deterrence policy must be present. The rung holds on the actor's own official channel carrying all three positions within forty-two seconds of each other; no outside corroboration of the underlying incident is in hand.

WHO CARRIED IT · EVERY MESSAGE, LINKED
  1. Al-Ahad TVAAH — official owned media05 Aug, 21:57

    We are proceeding with the government on the file of confining weapons to the state … a deterrence policy must be present.

    ماضون مع الحكومة بملف حصر السلاح بيد الدولة … سياسة الردع يجب ان تكون حاضرة

  2. Al-Ahad TVAAH — official owned media05 Aug, 21:57

    The targeting of the PMF is an American desire and not a Saudi one … it is wise not to respond to Saudi Arabia … Saudi targeting of the PMF is aggression.

    استهداف الحشد رغبة أمريكية وليست سعودية … من الحكمة عدم الرد على السعودية … استهداف السعودية للحشد عدوان

  3. Al-Ahad TVAAH — official owned media05 Aug, 21:57

    The statement responding to Saudi Arabia does not represent all of the Coordination Framework of Resistance … confining weapons is an Iraqi decision and is not linked to any position … everyone must submit to the decision to confine weapons to the state … the response must come from within state institutions, including the PMF.

    بيان الرد على السعودية لا يمثل جميع تنسيقية المقاومة … حصر السلاح قرار عراقي ولا يرتبط بأي موقف … يجب خضوع الجميع لقرار حصر السلاح بيد الدولة … الرد يجب ان يكون من داخل مؤسسات الدولة وضمنها الحشد

In posting order. Translated by the desk, published as evidence — not endorsement.
WHY IT MATTERS

A named AAH body member has put on record that a resistance-coalition statement does not carry his faction, which means any subsequent action taken under that collective label cannot be read as AAH-endorsed on current evidence.