On 26 August, Al-Ahad TV (AAH — official) carried five statements challenging PMF Chairman Faleh al-Fayyad’s tenure and conduct. Khalid Abu Iraq demanded his resignation and alleged political exploitation through pre-election appointments; Mukhled Hazem called his failure to attend parliament a potential legal violation, while Haitham al-Sabti said parliament could dismiss him if negligence concerning the reported Saudi strike were proven.
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Aug, 01:01
“Failure to answer parliament’s invitation is a “legal violation” that could reach questioning.”
عدم تلبية دعوة البرلمان "مخالفة قانونية" قد تصل الى الاستجواب
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Aug, 01:10
“Leave the “euphoria of the chair” and prove your love for the PMF by resigning.”
اترك "نشوة الكرسي" واثبت حبك للحشد بالتنحي
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Aug, 01:38
““Political exploitation” of the PMF: appointments were opened before the elections.”
"الاستغلال السياسي" لهيئة الحشد: التعيينات فتحت قبل الانتخابات
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Aug, 01:43
“Did the PMF chairmanship come to Fayyad by chance, or is it personal property from birth to death?!”
رئاسة هيئة الحشد "طلعت للفياض بالسحبة" او ملك شخصي من المهد الى اللحد؟!!
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official27 Aug, 01:44
“Parliament has the right to dismiss Fayyad if his negligence concerning the attack on the PMF is proven.”
لبرلمان حق اقالة الفياض في حال ثبوت تقصيره باستهداف الحشد
The criticism extends beyond accountability for the reported strike to Fayyad’s tenure and control of PMF appointments, while the proposed responses range from questioning to resignation or conditional dismissal.