On August 30, Al-Sharwgy 313 (AAH — unofficial leadership signal channel) accused PMF Commission chairman Faleh al-Fayyad of possessing advance information before a bombing of PMF sites that caused deaths, contradicting his reported denial, and asked why one party allegedly received the information while others did not. Al-Ahad TV (AAH — official owned media) carried Haytham al-Sabti’s argument that al-Fayyadh’s refusal to appear before parliament’s Security and Defense Committee was unlawful, that parliament could remove him if his answers were unsatisfactory, and that the PMF Commission law should be passed to guarantee personnel rights.
- Al-Ahad TVAAH — official owned media30 Aug, 20:54
“Faleh al-Fayyad’s refusal to appear before parliament is regrettable and unlawful... There are constitutional and legal avenues to remove PMF Commission chairman Faleh al-Fayyad if parliament is not convinced by his answers... The PMF Commission law should be passed.”
امتناع فالح الفياض عن الحضور إلى البرلمان يعد أمرا مؤسفا ومخالفا للقانون... هناك طرق دستورية وقانونية إزاء إقالة رئيس هيئة الحشد الشعبي فالح الفياض في حال عدم القناعة بأجوبته داخل البرلمان... يجب إقرار قانون هيئة الحشد الشعبي
- Al-Sharwgy 313AAH — unofficial leadership signal channel30 Aug, 21:10
“This confirms that he knew the information, contrary to what he apparently denied... If the information existed, why did it reach one party and not another? Is al-Fayyadh the chairman of the PMF Commission or the secretary-general of a faction?”
هذا يؤكد أنه كان يعلم بالمعلومة، وهذا خلاف لما نفاه ظاهراً... إذا كانت المعلومة موجودة، فلماذا وصلت إلى جهة دون أخرى؟ وهل الفياض هو رئيس هيئة الحشد أم أمين عام فصيل؟