Sabereen News posted at midday on 2 August, under the tag متداول (circulating — material being passed on rather than reported by the channel itself), a claim that the Iraqi Antiquities and Heritage Authority referred archaeologist Amer Abdul Razzaq for investigation after he spoke about an Iraqi bronze goat piece held among Iraqi antiquities in Kuwait; the accompanying document is a summons dated 1 July 2026 calling him to attend on 2 August. Just under half an hour later the same channel carried the Authority's statement that what was taken against him was not a referral for investigation but only questioning about what he mentioned in the file, within normal administrative follow-up. Both the claim and the official narrowing sit on the same channel, which is why the sequence itself is documented rather than inferred.
- Sabereen NewsKH — affiliated/aligned media02 Aug, 14:40
“Circulating — after he demanded its recovery from Kuwait: the referral of archaeological expert Amer Abdul Razzaq for investigation at the Iraqi Antiquities and Heritage Authority, following his statements about the presence of the Iraqi 'bronze goat' artefact among Iraqi antiquities in Kuwait.”
متداول — بعد مطالبته بإستردادها من الكويت .. إحالة الخبير الآثاري عامر عبد الرزاق إلى التحقيق في هيئة الآثار والتراث العراقية، بعد تصريحاته عن وجود قطعة "الماعز البرونزي" الأثرية العراقية ضمن مقتنيات أثرية عراقية في الكويت.
- Sabereen NewsKH — affiliated/aligned media02 Aug, 15:09
“The General Authority for Antiquities and Heritage: the Authority wishes to clarify that what was taken with regard to Mr Amer Abdul Razzaq is not considered a referral for investigation but was limited to questioning about what he mentioned in the file, within the framework of the normal administrative follow-up”
الهيئة العامة للآثار والتراث: تود الهيئة التوضيح بإن ما تم اتخاذه بحق السيد عامر عبد الرزاق لا يعد إحالة إلى التحقيق وإنما اقتصر على الاستفهام بشأن ما ذكره بالملف وذلك في إطار المتابعة الإدارية الطبيعية
A Kuwait cultural-property grievance and an Iraqi official's summons were both put into circulation by a KH-affiliated channel, and the state's own denial was carried on the same platform within the hour — the pressure story and its rebuttal reached the same audience from the same source.